Re: Theravada vs. Mahayana (correction to my 12-11 post)


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Buddha's Village Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by David on December 12, 1998 at 03:46:18:

In Reply to: Re: Theravada vs. Mahayana posted by David on December 11, 1998 at 11:35:46:

: Hi Joe,

: How they came to differ I am not sure. I read or heard somewhere that in India, sometime after the historical Buddha's passing away, monks and nuns began to lose contact with the people. That many of them began to practice "just for themselves" and there was not a lot of interaction with the public anymore. It was also said that in response to this, some Masters initiated the teachings now called Mahayana as an expedient to redirect the Buddhist practice back to one strongly concerned with the helping others attain liberation. When the Buddha was alive, he encouraged his disciples to go to different areas to practice and beg so that many people could recieve merits from making offerings and come in contact with the Dharma. This is what I have heard, but I can no loner cite a source for this.

: I, like you, would very much like to hear from others who know more about this!

: As for all the celestial beings, powers, miracles and gods in the Mahayana Sutras, I have been surprised at how common place these things actually are in Theravada Sutras (Suttas). I have recently started reading the Majjhima Nikaya, the middle length discourses of the Buddha - one of the 4 divisions of the Pali Canon of Suttas spoken by Shakyamuni Buddha. I have only studied 8 of them so far (started last week), but there are many things said about celestial beings, powers, and gods. I can't recall any miracles as of now.

: For example, in the introduction there is mention of the 6 realms in Buddhist cosomology which encompasses many various heavenly realms. Furhter, in the (8 that I've read) Suttas themselves there are many sections that refer to these various heavenly realms and their sub-realms, as well as those that abide there. One celestial subject very much discussed is the non-returner Arahant who abides in a celestial abode until attainment of Buddhahood. As for powers, I am still surprised at how much the supranormal powers are discussed in these Suttas. Such as knowledge of past live, reading others' minds, etc. I, like you perhaps, previously thought that Theravada was very earthly oriented. Gods are also mentioned. For one, in reference to the Buddha as teacher of humans and gods. And in one Sutta the Buddha speaks of the misperception of some of these gods in particular heaven realms that mistake themselves as outside of the cycle of birth and death and believe they are the (or a) eternal creator. I believe he was telling this to a Noble Brahmin man who came to ask the Buddha questions.

: Finally, in the introduction, the translator monk mentioned that one Sutta in the Majjhima Nikaya is of the Buddha speaking the Dharma in a heavenly realm for those in that realm. I have not read that one yet though. Nor do I know how many such Sutta exist in the Digha Nikaya (long discourses) or the two collections of short discourses.

: So, maybe Theravada and Mahayana aren't so different as we thought. Maybe one is just a expedient variation of the other meant to adjust the practice of some Buddhists in a certian way at a certian time under certain circumstances. And, so, a new school is born. Just a possibility.

: What were the accounts of the Buddha's life you read from the two traditions?

: Sincerely,
: David

Correction: The account of gods mistaking themsleves for something they are not was not in one of the Majjhima Nikaya Suttas I have read so far (1-8), it was actually in the introduction to the Majjhima Nikaya, written by the transaltor monk Bhikkhu Bodhi. Bhikkhu Bodhi wrote this in reference to what is found in Sutta #49 of the Majjhima Nikaya (MN), which is the Sutta where the Buddha "transports" himself to the Brahma Heaven and teaches a Brahma (god) who has such delusions. In this Sutta, both the particular Brahma god and Mara himself take part, as well as this Brahma's retinue.

Hope that is more clear.

While I could not find an on-line translation of the entire Sutta MN49 (the Brahmanimantanika Sutta), there are other Theravada Suttas from the Majjhima and other 3 Nikayas of the Pali canon at..

http://world.std.com/~metta/canon/sutta.html

Also, if you want to scan summaries of all 152 Majjhima Nikaya Suttas written by Bhikkhu Bodhi, you can see these at..

http://www.yahshua.webhost.com.au/relig/main/bdhsm/canon/majjhima/summary.html

The summary of MN49 may at least give you a feel. If you're interested, take a look at summaries for MN23 and MN37, plus others for involvement of dieties.

Anyway, enough already, huh?!

More importantly, how do you personally find the teachings of Mahayana and Theravada to effect you differently? Do you find one more inspiring or motivating for you, or one more directive as far as application of the practice goes? Everyone will have their own preference and affinity, and I find that both have there strengths for me, I am just curious how you feel and why.

Thanks and best wishes,

David


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Buddha's Village Forum ] [ FAQ ]